Island Law of Butte County Charter County LAFCO Corporation
Island Law for LAFCO Article
During my research about island law, and Butte County, I came across this site after doing a search on the internet.
Why this is important to me, was when I was speaking with my attorney Lise Young about the crimes of Butte County, and contesting the jurisdictional hearing in my daughter’s case. The law librarians were there with her.
Another incident like this took place with Leela Alvarez, another victim of Butte County corruption, and the law librarian was present.
Butte County is still doing this information getting from the Butte County Law Librarians, like it is so happily noted in the article below from people that now live at Marrowstone Island. How can people have a fair trial when a quick meeting in the corridor at the Superior Court takes place, and like it says in the brief below:
“As a law librarian she needed to get information ASAP for the judges, court staff, lawyers, the public, and other county departments who made requests for legal information, often while trials were in process.”
I objected to the jurisdiction of my case being here in Butte County because of the evidence I had against the public officials. There is no way that any hearing would be treated fairly in this County.
Another factor with the librarian’s giving legal advice on island law is unacceptable to me, is because of the identified place of where some of the child pornography was produced at. One series of pictures were taken at none other than the Butte County Superior Court Law Library.
This series of pictures were sent to the FBI in Sacramento, and other places in California that deal with these kind of crimes. Since, nothing was done to stop the production of pornography by Butte County Official’s, and in places that are in Butte County like the Law Library in the Superior Court, I wrote a description of the series of pictures that were on our computer because of our investigation into the Butte County Pornography Ring (the computer that was stolen by two Butte County Sheriff Deputies on the night of December 17, 2004), and I sent this to all of the media sources that I could find. I sent it to the Senate, Interpol, and many other places, and still nothing has been done concerning the prosecution of these corrupt individuals and County operating under Island Law through the LAFCO Corporation to avoid prosecution.
I had a legal right to investigate the pornography because I was looking for my own abusers and pictures when my mother sold me to Butte County Officials for sex when I was a child. I did tell the Butte County Court about this, and it was shrugged off as another one of my wild stories. Pictures don’t lie. The truth is the truth, and I will not stop until the people perpetrating children in this manner in this County are taken out of office, and it stops.
Here is the description of the law library documentation with the name of one of the girls not named, because she has been identified. This girl was listed as a runaway by Butte County Children’s Services, and has never been seen again as far as we know from our own investigation. Some of the description sent to authorities was left out also because of the threats and attempts on our lives because of the information that we have.
Picture: 01 – These are two girls that are XXXXXXXX as ………….These pictures were found from the Server at the Butte County Sheriff’s Department Substation that was in Magailia, and registered to Butte Co. were sending these out. These girls were in Foster Care in Butte County at one time. Background: Dark Wood French Doors, Wood Chair with red cushion, and no arms. Dark Wood Cabinet with glass shelf, Orange Walls, Wood Parquet Flooring, Painting that was purchased through Home Interiors, with orange background, oak tree in the middle, with people around the tree, orange dirt, This room looks to me like it is in the old Law Library, or a Judge’s Chambers in the Butte County Superior Court. (This picture was confirmed to have been taken in the old Butte County Law Library by confidential sources.) The blonde with medium length hair done in two low braids and yellow flowers, is wearing a black and white necktie. The white outlines the black on the necktie. She is also wearing black knee length nylons, and has a waist high see through black panty at her ankles. The girl appears to be about thirteen or fourteen years old. The brunette girl with medium length hair done in high braids with yellow flowers in her hair, is wearing a black necktie, and a dark blue cotton g string at thigh height with blonde holding on to them. The brunette appears to be about thirteen or fourteen years old. XXXXXX XXXXXXXX was known to use this hair style with nearly every girl that came through the XXXXX including XXXXXXXXXXXXXX . Word was given to us by a confidential informant that XXXXXXX was the hair stylist for the pornography ring. XXXXX was also involved in a photography business XXXXXXXXXXX our XXXXXXXXXXX, and is involved in the production of child pornography and pedophilia.
http://www.marrowstone.com/brief4.html
“Rose Ellen and Joel Leonard had been visiting the island since 1970 and residing at Smitty's for 10 years before buying property on Griffiths Point Road. They retired in June, 1995, moved to Marrowstone and are in the process of building a house. Rose Ellen was a law librarian. She worked as director for the Butte County, California law library until her retirement. As a law librarian she needed to get information ASAP for the judges, court staff, lawyers, the public, and other county departments who made requests for legal information, often while trials were in process. The knack of knowing where to find the answers had to be at hand. Joel was the Business and Law librarian at California State University, Chico, for 26 years. He also taught library research and writing in geography.”
Here is another example of how Island Law works when the Butte County LAFCO corporation wants something. They will do it their way.
Partial copy of minutes on May 5, 2005
Link to the full pdf file is here:
http://www.buttelafco.org/_mod_minute/content/12_May_5-5-2005.pdf.
This concerns a contested Annexation in the City Of Gridley.
P Butte Local Agency Formation Commission P Minutes of May 5, 2005 P Page 3 P
5.3
05-02(a) - City of Gridley - Vermont Street Annexation No. 1
A memo from Dr. Charles Adams was submitted at the hearing.
Chair Leverenz asked Scott Browne, LAFCO Legal Counsel, if he had a chance to review the
memo from Dr. Adams.
Mr. Browne said he did not have the time to thoroughly research the issue prior to the hearing.
He added that he preferred to research it before a decision was made, and that the issue is
between what the statute says and the inherent right of an agency to withdraw its application.
Chair Leverenz opened the hearing to the public concerning the merits of the annexation.
Glen Crawford, 228 Little Avenue, Gridley, indicated that he did not want to be annexed. He mentioned that the City did not want to annex the additional parcels initially and that the residents have been sucked into a turmoil that they can not seem to escape due to one legality or another. He briefly discussed issues that occurred with the protests regarding the previous proposal.
Chair Leverenz stated that the Vermont proposal originally came to LAFCO as an ordinary annexation where issues such as protests applied; however, the City has withdrawn that application and has resubmitted an application as an island annexation which is governed by a different set of rules and regulations.
(I believe that in the statement above, it shows how Butte County LAFCO corporation can just change things at will for anyone who has a grievance about what is taking place)
Mr. Crawford said he thought that once something is voted on it has to be completed.
Chair Leverenz replied that Dr. Adams has raised that issue with his memo. Chair Leverenz
Anticipated that the Commission would receive public input and continue the matter to give Legal
Counsel an opportunity to review that issue.
Commissioner Cook proposed that a motion could be made subject to final legal approval so the proposal would not need to come before the Commission again.
(I believe that the statement above is a way to lock out any way of someone protesting about an issue to do anything about it in the future.)
Charles Adams, 38 Arroyo Way, Chico, suggested that the attorney, in reviewing this issue, should consider Section 57000 in the Government Code and Sections (d) through (f).
(What normal citizen is going to know what section 57000, and sections (d) through (f), in the government code is?)
Chair Leverenz said if it is a valid island annexation, the Commission does not have a great deal of discretion, and if it is not valid then the Commission will not be able to proceed with it.
Dr. Adams said if Legal Counsel says anything other than what the law says, he fully intends to go to the Superior Court and get a restraining order.
(Does this look like there are any rights for the person contesting an action? It doesn’t look like it to me.)
As there were no further public comments, Chair Leverenz closed the hearing to the public.
He asked Mr. Browne if the Commission could approve the proposal subject to legal approval.
Mr. Browne replied that the legal opinion should be considered before a decision is made.
Chair Leverenz proposed a 30-day continuance.
Commissioner Cook asked if the Commission approved the proposal subject to legal review, if
there was a 30-day period following where the decision could be challenged.
Page 4
P Butte Local Agency Formation Commission P Minutes of May 5, 2005 P Page 4 P
Mr. Browne said a Request for Reconsideration can be filed within 30 days of any decision the Commission makes, but it can go directly to court under recent California Supreme Court rulings.
(I believe that with the threat of getting a restraining order if the complaining party did not agree to the annexation, this quoted statement is only more intimidation.) No Redress.
Chair Leverenz added that it is a 90-day writ of mandate.
Commissioner Cook said if the Commission approves the proposal subject to legal review and
Legal Counsel returns with the opinion that the action proposed by staff is legal, then the
annexation would be complete and there would be a 90-day period in which someone could
appeal that decision.
Ms. Leasure replied no, there is a 30-day reconsideration period and to do a reconsideration it
has to be new information, it can not be based on information that has already been submitted.
Commissioner Dolan said if the Commission made that action today there would be no specific
date in which it would be finalized, and the Commission would be giving away its decision-making
authority to Legal Counsel.
It was moved by Commissioner Beck, seconded by Commissioner Connelly, and carried to
continue 05-02(a) - City of Gridley - Vermont Street Annexation No. 1 for 30 days.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES:
Commissioners Beck, Connelly, Dolan, Hunter, Lotter, and Chair Leverenz
NOES:
Commissioner Cook
ABSENT:
None
ABSTAINS: None
The Island Law issue will be continued, and added to this post………………..
Written By,
Pamela Mulaskey
Island Law for LAFCO Article
During my research about island law, and Butte County, I came across this site after doing a search on the internet.
Why this is important to me, was when I was speaking with my attorney Lise Young about the crimes of Butte County, and contesting the jurisdictional hearing in my daughter’s case. The law librarians were there with her.
Another incident like this took place with Leela Alvarez, another victim of Butte County corruption, and the law librarian was present.
Butte County is still doing this information getting from the Butte County Law Librarians, like it is so happily noted in the article below from people that now live at Marrowstone Island. How can people have a fair trial when a quick meeting in the corridor at the Superior Court takes place, and like it says in the brief below:
“As a law librarian she needed to get information ASAP for the judges, court staff, lawyers, the public, and other county departments who made requests for legal information, often while trials were in process.”
I objected to the jurisdiction of my case being here in Butte County because of the evidence I had against the public officials. There is no way that any hearing would be treated fairly in this County.
Another factor with the librarian’s giving legal advice on island law is unacceptable to me, is because of the identified place of where some of the child pornography was produced at. One series of pictures were taken at none other than the Butte County Superior Court Law Library.
This series of pictures were sent to the FBI in Sacramento, and other places in California that deal with these kind of crimes. Since, nothing was done to stop the production of pornography by Butte County Official’s, and in places that are in Butte County like the Law Library in the Superior Court, I wrote a description of the series of pictures that were on our computer because of our investigation into the Butte County Pornography Ring (the computer that was stolen by two Butte County Sheriff Deputies on the night of December 17, 2004), and I sent this to all of the media sources that I could find. I sent it to the Senate, Interpol, and many other places, and still nothing has been done concerning the prosecution of these corrupt individuals and County operating under Island Law through the LAFCO Corporation to avoid prosecution.
I had a legal right to investigate the pornography because I was looking for my own abusers and pictures when my mother sold me to Butte County Officials for sex when I was a child. I did tell the Butte County Court about this, and it was shrugged off as another one of my wild stories. Pictures don’t lie. The truth is the truth, and I will not stop until the people perpetrating children in this manner in this County are taken out of office, and it stops.
Here is the description of the law library documentation with the name of one of the girls not named, because she has been identified. This girl was listed as a runaway by Butte County Children’s Services, and has never been seen again as far as we know from our own investigation. Some of the description sent to authorities was left out also because of the threats and attempts on our lives because of the information that we have.
Picture: 01 – These are two girls that are XXXXXXXX as ………….These pictures were found from the Server at the Butte County Sheriff’s Department Substation that was in Magailia, and registered to Butte Co. were sending these out. These girls were in Foster Care in Butte County at one time. Background: Dark Wood French Doors, Wood Chair with red cushion, and no arms. Dark Wood Cabinet with glass shelf, Orange Walls, Wood Parquet Flooring, Painting that was purchased through Home Interiors, with orange background, oak tree in the middle, with people around the tree, orange dirt, This room looks to me like it is in the old Law Library, or a Judge’s Chambers in the Butte County Superior Court. (This picture was confirmed to have been taken in the old Butte County Law Library by confidential sources.) The blonde with medium length hair done in two low braids and yellow flowers, is wearing a black and white necktie. The white outlines the black on the necktie. She is also wearing black knee length nylons, and has a waist high see through black panty at her ankles. The girl appears to be about thirteen or fourteen years old. The brunette girl with medium length hair done in high braids with yellow flowers in her hair, is wearing a black necktie, and a dark blue cotton g string at thigh height with blonde holding on to them. The brunette appears to be about thirteen or fourteen years old. XXXXXX XXXXXXXX was known to use this hair style with nearly every girl that came through the XXXXX including XXXXXXXXXXXXXX . Word was given to us by a confidential informant that XXXXXXX was the hair stylist for the pornography ring. XXXXX was also involved in a photography business XXXXXXXXXXX our XXXXXXXXXXX, and is involved in the production of child pornography and pedophilia.
http://www.marrowstone.com/brief4.html
“Rose Ellen and Joel Leonard had been visiting the island since 1970 and residing at Smitty's for 10 years before buying property on Griffiths Point Road. They retired in June, 1995, moved to Marrowstone and are in the process of building a house. Rose Ellen was a law librarian. She worked as director for the Butte County, California law library until her retirement. As a law librarian she needed to get information ASAP for the judges, court staff, lawyers, the public, and other county departments who made requests for legal information, often while trials were in process. The knack of knowing where to find the answers had to be at hand. Joel was the Business and Law librarian at California State University, Chico, for 26 years. He also taught library research and writing in geography.”
Here is another example of how Island Law works when the Butte County LAFCO corporation wants something. They will do it their way.
Partial copy of minutes on May 5, 2005
Link to the full pdf file is here:
http://www.buttelafco.org/_mod_minute/content/12_May_5-5-2005.pdf.
This concerns a contested Annexation in the City Of Gridley.
P Butte Local Agency Formation Commission P Minutes of May 5, 2005 P Page 3 P
5.3
05-02(a) - City of Gridley - Vermont Street Annexation No. 1
A memo from Dr. Charles Adams was submitted at the hearing.
Chair Leverenz asked Scott Browne, LAFCO Legal Counsel, if he had a chance to review the
memo from Dr. Adams.
Mr. Browne said he did not have the time to thoroughly research the issue prior to the hearing.
He added that he preferred to research it before a decision was made, and that the issue is
between what the statute says and the inherent right of an agency to withdraw its application.
Chair Leverenz opened the hearing to the public concerning the merits of the annexation.
Glen Crawford, 228 Little Avenue, Gridley, indicated that he did not want to be annexed. He mentioned that the City did not want to annex the additional parcels initially and that the residents have been sucked into a turmoil that they can not seem to escape due to one legality or another. He briefly discussed issues that occurred with the protests regarding the previous proposal.
Chair Leverenz stated that the Vermont proposal originally came to LAFCO as an ordinary annexation where issues such as protests applied; however, the City has withdrawn that application and has resubmitted an application as an island annexation which is governed by a different set of rules and regulations.
(I believe that in the statement above, it shows how Butte County LAFCO corporation can just change things at will for anyone who has a grievance about what is taking place)
Mr. Crawford said he thought that once something is voted on it has to be completed.
Chair Leverenz replied that Dr. Adams has raised that issue with his memo. Chair Leverenz
Anticipated that the Commission would receive public input and continue the matter to give Legal
Counsel an opportunity to review that issue.
Commissioner Cook proposed that a motion could be made subject to final legal approval so the proposal would not need to come before the Commission again.
(I believe that the statement above is a way to lock out any way of someone protesting about an issue to do anything about it in the future.)
Charles Adams, 38 Arroyo Way, Chico, suggested that the attorney, in reviewing this issue, should consider Section 57000 in the Government Code and Sections (d) through (f).
(What normal citizen is going to know what section 57000, and sections (d) through (f), in the government code is?)
Chair Leverenz said if it is a valid island annexation, the Commission does not have a great deal of discretion, and if it is not valid then the Commission will not be able to proceed with it.
Dr. Adams said if Legal Counsel says anything other than what the law says, he fully intends to go to the Superior Court and get a restraining order.
(Does this look like there are any rights for the person contesting an action? It doesn’t look like it to me.)
As there were no further public comments, Chair Leverenz closed the hearing to the public.
He asked Mr. Browne if the Commission could approve the proposal subject to legal approval.
Mr. Browne replied that the legal opinion should be considered before a decision is made.
Chair Leverenz proposed a 30-day continuance.
Commissioner Cook asked if the Commission approved the proposal subject to legal review, if
there was a 30-day period following where the decision could be challenged.
Page 4
P Butte Local Agency Formation Commission P Minutes of May 5, 2005 P Page 4 P
Mr. Browne said a Request for Reconsideration can be filed within 30 days of any decision the Commission makes, but it can go directly to court under recent California Supreme Court rulings.
(I believe that with the threat of getting a restraining order if the complaining party did not agree to the annexation, this quoted statement is only more intimidation.) No Redress.
Chair Leverenz added that it is a 90-day writ of mandate.
Commissioner Cook said if the Commission approves the proposal subject to legal review and
Legal Counsel returns with the opinion that the action proposed by staff is legal, then the
annexation would be complete and there would be a 90-day period in which someone could
appeal that decision.
Ms. Leasure replied no, there is a 30-day reconsideration period and to do a reconsideration it
has to be new information, it can not be based on information that has already been submitted.
Commissioner Dolan said if the Commission made that action today there would be no specific
date in which it would be finalized, and the Commission would be giving away its decision-making
authority to Legal Counsel.
It was moved by Commissioner Beck, seconded by Commissioner Connelly, and carried to
continue 05-02(a) - City of Gridley - Vermont Street Annexation No. 1 for 30 days.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES:
Commissioners Beck, Connelly, Dolan, Hunter, Lotter, and Chair Leverenz
NOES:
Commissioner Cook
ABSENT:
None
ABSTAINS: None
The Island Law issue will be continued, and added to this post………………..
Written By,
Pamela Mulaskey
posted by Pamela Mulaskey at 4:05 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home