We Have A New Website

We have a new web site, and here is the link to it.

http://www.fightingbuttecounty.4t.com

Pamela Mulaskey

Island Law of Butte County Charter County LAFCO Corporation

Island Law for LAFCO Article

During my research about island law, and Butte County, I came across this site after doing a search on the internet.

Why this is important to me, was when I was speaking with my attorney Lise Young about the crimes of Butte County, and contesting the jurisdictional hearing in my daughter’s case. The law librarians were there with her.

Another incident like this took place with Leela Alvarez, another victim of Butte County corruption, and the law librarian was present.

Butte County is still doing this information getting from the Butte County Law Librarians, like it is so happily noted in the article below from people that now live at Marrowstone Island. How can people have a fair trial when a quick meeting in the corridor at the Superior Court takes place, and like it says in the brief below:

“As a law librarian she needed to get information ASAP for the judges, court staff, lawyers, the public, and other county departments who made requests for legal information, often while trials were in process.”

I objected to the jurisdiction of my case being here in Butte County because of the evidence I had against the public officials. There is no way that any hearing would be treated fairly in this County.

Another factor with the librarian’s giving legal advice on island law is unacceptable to me, is because of the identified place of where some of the child pornography was produced at. One series of pictures were taken at none other than the Butte County Superior Court Law Library.

This series of pictures were sent to the FBI in Sacramento, and other places in California that deal with these kind of crimes. Since, nothing was done to stop the production of pornography by Butte County Official’s, and in places that are in Butte County like the Law Library in the Superior Court, I wrote a description of the series of pictures that were on our computer because of our investigation into the Butte County Pornography Ring (the computer that was stolen by two Butte County Sheriff Deputies on the night of December 17, 2004), and I sent this to all of the media sources that I could find. I sent it to the Senate, Interpol, and many other places, and still nothing has been done concerning the prosecution of these corrupt individuals and County operating under Island Law through the LAFCO Corporation to avoid prosecution.

I had a legal right to investigate the pornography because I was looking for my own abusers and pictures when my mother sold me to Butte County Officials for sex when I was a child. I did tell the Butte County Court about this, and it was shrugged off as another one of my wild stories. Pictures don’t lie. The truth is the truth, and I will not stop until the people perpetrating children in this manner in this County are taken out of office, and it stops.

Here is the description of the law library documentation with the name of one of the girls not named, because she has been identified. This girl was listed as a runaway by Butte County Children’s Services, and has never been seen again as far as we know from our own investigation. Some of the description sent to authorities was left out also because of the threats and attempts on our lives because of the information that we have.


Picture: 01 – These are two girls that are XXXXXXXX as ………….These pictures were found from the Server at the Butte County Sheriff’s Department Substation that was in Magailia, and registered to Butte Co. were sending these out. These girls were in Foster Care in Butte County at one time. Background: Dark Wood French Doors, Wood Chair with red cushion, and no arms. Dark Wood Cabinet with glass shelf, Orange Walls, Wood Parquet Flooring, Painting that was purchased through Home Interiors, with orange background, oak tree in the middle, with people around the tree, orange dirt, This room looks to me like it is in the old Law Library, or a Judge’s Chambers in the Butte County Superior Court. (This picture was confirmed to have been taken in the old Butte County Law Library by confidential sources.) The blonde with medium length hair done in two low braids and yellow flowers, is wearing a black and white necktie. The white outlines the black on the necktie. She is also wearing black knee length nylons, and has a waist high see through black panty at her ankles. The girl appears to be about thirteen or fourteen years old. The brunette girl with medium length hair done in high braids with yellow flowers in her hair, is wearing a black necktie, and a dark blue cotton g string at thigh height with blonde holding on to them. The brunette appears to be about thirteen or fourteen years old. XXXXXX XXXXXXXX was known to use this hair style with nearly every girl that came through the XXXXX including XXXXXXXXXXXXXX . Word was given to us by a confidential informant that XXXXXXX was the hair stylist for the pornography ring. XXXXX was also involved in a photography business XXXXXXXXXXX our XXXXXXXXXXX, and is involved in the production of child pornography and pedophilia.

http://www.marrowstone.com/brief4.html

“Rose Ellen and Joel Leonard had been visiting the island since 1970 and residing at Smitty's for 10 years before buying property on Griffiths Point Road. They retired in June, 1995, moved to Marrowstone and are in the process of building a house. Rose Ellen was a law librarian. She worked as director for the Butte County, California law library until her retirement. As a law librarian she needed to get information ASAP for the judges, court staff, lawyers, the public, and other county departments who made requests for legal information, often while trials were in process. The knack of knowing where to find the answers had to be at hand. Joel was the Business and Law librarian at California State University, Chico, for 26 years. He also taught library research and writing in geography.”

Here is another example of how Island Law works when the Butte County LAFCO corporation wants something. They will do it their way.

Partial copy of minutes on May 5, 2005

Link to the full pdf file is here:

http://www.buttelafco.org/_mod_minute/content/12_May_5-5-2005.pdf.

This concerns a contested Annexation in the City Of Gridley.

P Butte Local Agency Formation Commission P Minutes of May 5, 2005 P Page 3 P
5.3

05-02(a) - City of Gridley - Vermont Street Annexation No. 1

A memo from Dr. Charles Adams was submitted at the hearing.
Chair Leverenz asked Scott Browne, LAFCO Legal Counsel, if he had a chance to review the
memo from Dr. Adams.

Mr. Browne said he did not have the time to thoroughly research the issue prior to the hearing.
He added that he preferred to research it before a decision was made, and that the issue is
between what the statute says and the inherent right of an agency to withdraw its application.

Chair Leverenz opened the hearing to the public concerning the merits of the annexation.

Glen Crawford, 228 Little Avenue, Gridley, indicated that he did not want to be annexed. He mentioned that the City did not want to annex the additional parcels initially and that the residents have been sucked into a turmoil that they can not seem to escape due to one legality or another. He briefly discussed issues that occurred with the protests regarding the previous proposal.

Chair Leverenz stated that the Vermont proposal originally came to LAFCO as an ordinary annexation where issues such as protests applied; however, the City has withdrawn that application and has resubmitted an application as an island annexation which is governed by a different set of rules and regulations.

(I believe that in the statement above, it shows how Butte County LAFCO corporation can just change things at will for anyone who has a grievance about what is taking place)

Mr. Crawford said he thought that once something is voted on it has to be completed.
Chair Leverenz replied that Dr. Adams has raised that issue with his memo. Chair Leverenz
Anticipated that the Commission would receive public input and continue the matter to give Legal
Counsel an opportunity to review that issue.

Commissioner Cook proposed that a motion could be made subject to final legal approval so the proposal would not need to come before the Commission again.

(I believe that the statement above is a way to lock out any way of someone protesting about an issue to do anything about it in the future.)

Charles Adams, 38 Arroyo Way, Chico, suggested that the attorney, in reviewing this issue, should consider Section 57000 in the Government Code and Sections (d) through (f).

(What normal citizen is going to know what section 57000, and sections (d) through (f), in the government code is?)

Chair Leverenz said if it is a valid island annexation, the Commission does not have a great deal of discretion, and if it is not valid then the Commission will not be able to proceed with it.

Dr. Adams said if Legal Counsel says anything other than what the law says, he fully intends to go to the Superior Court and get a restraining order.

(Does this look like there are any rights for the person contesting an action? It doesn’t look like it to me.)

As there were no further public comments, Chair Leverenz closed the hearing to the public.

He asked Mr. Browne if the Commission could approve the proposal subject to legal approval.

Mr. Browne replied that the legal opinion should be considered before a decision is made.

Chair Leverenz proposed a 30-day continuance.

Commissioner Cook asked if the Commission approved the proposal subject to legal review, if
there was a 30-day period following where the decision could be challenged.

Page 4

P Butte Local Agency Formation Commission P Minutes of May 5, 2005 P Page 4 P

Mr. Browne said a Request for Reconsideration can be filed within 30 days of any decision the Commission makes, but it can go directly to court under recent California Supreme Court rulings.

(I believe that with the threat of getting a restraining order if the complaining party did not agree to the annexation, this quoted statement is only more intimidation.) No Redress.

Chair Leverenz added that it is a 90-day writ of mandate.

Commissioner Cook said if the Commission approves the proposal subject to legal review and
Legal Counsel returns with the opinion that the action proposed by staff is legal, then the
annexation would be complete and there would be a 90-day period in which someone could
appeal that decision.

Ms. Leasure replied no, there is a 30-day reconsideration period and to do a reconsideration it
has to be new information, it can not be based on information that has already been submitted.

Commissioner Dolan said if the Commission made that action today there would be no specific
date in which it would be finalized, and the Commission would be giving away its decision-making
authority to Legal Counsel.

It was moved by Commissioner Beck, seconded by Commissioner Connelly, and carried to
continue 05-02(a) - City of Gridley - Vermont Street Annexation No. 1 for 30 days.

The motion was carried by the following vote:

AYES:
Commissioners Beck, Connelly, Dolan, Hunter, Lotter, and Chair Leverenz

NOES:
Commissioner Cook

ABSENT:
None

ABSTAINS: None


The Island Law issue will be continued, and added to this post………………..

Written By,

Pamela Mulaskey

UPDATE:

At the time that these snapshots were taken, even the icons to the right for viewing were not available until information about this problem was reported to many agenices of the government and media.

A report about Island Law, and the Butte County Charter LAFCO corporation will be posted soon.

written by,

Pamela Mulaskey

This last one that is not available for downloading is one of the most important. This has sample protest forms. As you can see in the snapshot, the pdf files are not available for download to the public. This makes it so anyone protesting an action that LAFCO has decided upon, the litigant has to see the oppressor's in person to get the forms. It is against LAFCO law to not make these available to the public on their site. No Redress. That is this Charter County's policy. 

This is another snapshot of the Butte County LAFCO site, and again the pdf file that is supposed to be available for download to the public about it's policies and procedures are not available. If it can be downloaded, it shows up in a red color. What are they hiding? Other LAFCO sites have this pdf file available. 

On the Butte County LAFCO site, I took snapshots of their pages. This one shows that their pdf file under Intro can't be downloaded. The pdf files show up in a red color if they can be downloaded. Go to the site, and see for yourself. This public information is supposed to be available. It is not. It is on other LAFCO sites though. What are they hiding? 

Links to our other Blogs.

Blogs and their titles

Before and After
http://beforeandafterbuttecounty.blogspot.com
Butte County Terrorism
http://fightingbuttecounty.blogspot.com/
The Truth
http://ourdocumentation.blogspot.com/
Cults of Oroville
http://criminalcultsoforoville.blogspot.com/
Butte County Anti-Environment
http://orovilleiscontaminated.blogspot.com/
Butte County Arson Fires You Decide. Arson?
http://arsonfiresinoroville.blogspot.com/
The Truth About Oroville
http://savingourkids.seo-blog.org/
Butte County Terrorism And The Animal Victims
http://buttecountyanimalcruelty.blogspot.com/
Butte County LAFCO and No Redress
http://buttecountylafcocorporationnoredress.blogspot.com/



http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/106345324?ltl=1127506561
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/387659193?ltl=1127508817

I believe that it is important to explain what Title 18 is by posting the US Code Collection in part, so that it is clear what a County is supposed to do by law, and by posting the US Code Collection, the law being broken can also be clearly seen.

I am posting the codes and laws first on this site, so when I post about the LAFCO Corporation in Butte County, and Island Law, and other things that Butte County has kept themselves protected from prosecution. The victim's of Butte County did not know about this County being a Charter County, and other important items. The former and current victims of Racketeering by Butte County Officials will finally have a voice. It is my hope to bring an end to the barbaric torture that has taken place in this County for so many years. The Officials have acted as though they are above the law, and believe that they can never be prosecuted for any crimes through murder, intimidation, threats, fires, embezzlement, and on and on.............

This US Code deals with racketeering under Title 18 of the US Code.

I must give credit to the Legal Information Institute for having this information available to the public. We are not affiliated with the Legal Information Institute with this case. This information came from their website located at: http://www.law.cornell.edu/



US CODE COLLECTION


collection home
search
donate

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 96 > § 1961
Prev Next
§ 1961. Definitions

Release date: 2004-08-06

As used in this chapter—
(1) “racketeering activity” means
(A) any act or threat involving murder, kidnapping, gambling, arson, robbery, bribery, extortion, dealing in obscene matter, or dealing in a controlled substance or listed chemical (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act), which is chargeable under State law and punishable by imprisonment for more than one year;
(B) any act which is indictable under any of the following provisions of title 18, United States Code: Section 201 (relating to bribery), section 224 (relating to sports bribery), sections 471, 472, and 473 (relating to counterfeiting), section 659 (relating to theft from interstate shipment) if the act indictable under section 659 is felonious, section 664 (relating to embezzlement from pension and welfare funds), sections 891–894 (relating to extortionate credit transactions), section 1028 (relating to fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents), section 1029 (relating to fraud and related activity in connection with access devices), section 1084 (relating to the transmission of gambling information), section 1341 (relating to mail fraud), section 1343 (relating to wire fraud), section 1344 (relating to financial institution fraud), section 1425 (relating to the procurement of citizenship or nationalization unlawfully), section 1426 (relating to the reproduction of naturalization or citizenship papers), section 1427 (relating to the sale of naturalization or citizenship papers), sections 1461–1465 (relating to obscene matter), section 1503 (relating to obstruction of justice), section 1510 (relating to obstruction of criminal investigations), section 1511 (relating to the obstruction of State or local law enforcement), section 1512 (relating to tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant), section 1513 (relating to retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant), section 1542 (relating to false statement in application and use of passport), section 1543 (relating to forgery or false use of passport), section 1544 (relating to misuse of passport), section 1546 (relating to fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents), sections 1581–1588 (relating to peonage and slavery), section 1951 (relating to interference with commerce, robbery, or extortion), section 1952 (relating to racketeering), section 1953 (relating to interstate transportation of wagering paraphernalia), section 1954 (relating to unlawful welfare fund payments), section 1955 (relating to the prohibition of illegal gambling businesses), section 1956 (relating to the laundering of monetary instruments), section 1957 (relating to engaging in monetary transactions in property derived from specified unlawful activity), section 1958 (relating to use of interstate commerce facilities in the commission of murder-for-hire), sections 2251, 2251A, 2252, and 2260 (relating to sexual exploitation of children), sections 2312 and 2313 (relating to interstate transportation of stolen motor vehicles), sections 2314 and 2315 (relating to interstate transportation of stolen property), section 2318 (relating to trafficking in counterfeit labels for phonorecords, computer programs or computer program documentation or packaging and copies of motion pictures or other audiovisual works), section 2319 (relating to criminal infringement of a copyright), section 2319A (relating to unauthorized fixation of and trafficking in sound recordings and music videos of live musical performances), section 2320 (relating to trafficking in goods or services bearing counterfeit marks), section 2321 (relating to trafficking in certain motor vehicles or motor vehicle parts), sections 2341–2346 (relating to trafficking in contraband cigarettes), sections 2421–24 (relating to white slave traffic),
(C) any act which is indictable under title 29, United States Code, section 186 (dealing with restrictions on payments and loans to labor organizations) or section 501 (c) (relating to embezzlement from union funds), (D) any offense involving fraud connected with a case under title 11 (except a case under section 157 of this title), fraud in the sale of securities, or the felonious manufacture, importation, receiving, concealment, buying, selling, or otherwise dealing in a controlled substance or listed chemical (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act), punishable under any law of the United States,
(E) any act which is indictable under the Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act,
(F) any act which is indictable under the Immigration and Nationality Act, section 274 (relating to bringing in and harboring certain aliens), section 277 (relating to aiding or assisting certain aliens to enter the United States), or section 278 (relating to importation of alien for immoral purpose) if the act indictable under such section of such Act was committed for the purpose of financial gain, or
(G) any act that is indictable under any provision listed in section 2332b (g)(5)(B);
(2) “State” means any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, any territory or possession of the United States, any political subdivision, or any department, agency, or instrumentality thereof;
(3) “person” includes any individual or entity capable of holding a legal or beneficial interest in property;
(4) “enterprise” includes any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity, and any union or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity;
(5) “pattern of racketeering activity” requires at least two acts of racketeering activity, one of which occurred after the effective date of this chapter and the last of which occurred within ten years (excluding any period of imprisonment) after the commission of a prior act of racketeering activity;
(6) “unlawful debt” means a debt
(A) incurred or contracted in gambling activity which was in violation of the law of the United States, a State or political subdivision thereof, or which is unenforceable under State or Federal law in whole or in part as to principal or interest because of the laws relating to usury, and
(B) which was incurred in connection with the business of gambling in violation of the law of the United States, a State or political subdivision thereof, or the business of lending money or a thing of value at a rate usurious under State or Federal law, where the usurious rate is at least twice the enforceable rate;
(7) “racketeering investigator” means any attorney or investigator so designated by the Attorney General and charged with the duty of enforcing or carrying into effect this chapter;
(8) “racketeering investigation” means any inquiry conducted by any racketeering investigator for the purpose of ascertaining whether any person has been involved in any violation of this chapter or of any final order, judgment, or decree of any court of the United States, duly entered in any case or proceeding arising under this chapter;
(9) “documentary material” includes any book, paper, document, record, recording, or other material; and
(10) “Attorney General” includes the Attorney General of the United States, the Deputy Attorney General of the United States, the Associate Attorney General of the United States, any Assistant Attorney General of the United States, or any employee of the Department of Justice or any employee of any department or agency of the United States so designated by the Attorney General to carry out the powers conferred on the Attorney General by this chapter. Any department or agency so designated may use in investigations authorized by this chapter either the investigative provisions of this chapter or the investigative power of such department or agency otherwise conferred by law.
Search this title:
Notes Updates Parallel authorities (CFR) Your comments



Prev Next
LII has no control over and does not endorse any external Internet site that contains links to or references LII.
credits
about us
send email

I have created this blog from a need for Butte County Citizen's to understand how this County operates as a corporation, and how local laws, and constitutional laws can be violated, and leave the victim's of Butte County Terrorism have no right to redress.

I will show the Butte County Citizen's how the agencies work together to hide crimes, and jail innocent victim's for crimes that they didn't commit for revenue.

I will show how the Butte County Superior Court Operates, so there is no hope for a fair trial.

My hope in this information is to give others courage to stand up to injustice that has been taking place for so long that it's terrorized citizen's are silenced. Many dare not speak up because of the threats to their families, pets, homes, and their very lives. Most people who have tried to bring this information have been murdered. It has to stop. I have seen too much, and know too much, to allow this to continue.

Through this journey, there have been threats and attempts on our lives, and this makes it most important NOT TO BE SILENT.

Written by Pamela Mulaskey